Pornographers are getting better and better as the years go by. Here’s a photograph that looks to have fallen from a perfume ad. Sure it’s sexually explicit, but to be honest, I barely even notice the sex as much as the emotion and intensity conveyed by the model’s joyous face. It’s only at second glance that you realize, “oh my, she’s naked!” which isn’t a bad thing at all.
A glimpse of beautiful, tasteful and artistic pornography
Chanel 5 sales would probably increase just a tad if they used this instead. (Or maybe ath & Body Works would be more appropriate as it appears the couple was enjoying nice scrin scrubbing pampering before doing it on the side of the tub.)
Agreed that the facial expression is priceless, as is the full-body-length view of those two beautiful bodies colliding into each other (always tough for photographers to get both a wide shot and such detail in the same frame.) The way he grasps her right foot for those thrusts gives you an appreciation for the action occuring.
You got me thinking and yes – this would work just fine as an ad for just such a product. Women’s magazines are already using nudity and sexually suggestive imagery to sell products, so is it really such a leap to use an explicit image such as this. Sure – perhaps it’s too provocative to actually show penetration, but I can see this photograph cropped mere millimeters from her pubic hair being published and turning quite a few heads. Oh-la-la.
Chanel No 5′s latest ad campaign?
http://www.artfulporn.com/wp-content/uploads/channel.jpg
Ha ha ha ha to your new ad campaign; Pat, we think you could fund this entire site by doing some freelance Chanel No 5 ads on spec.
In fact, to make this a little more amusing, it really honestly isn’t that far off: Look at Chanel’s ad here which seems to be trending in that same direction:
http://images.fanpop.com/images/image_uploads/Chanel-chanel-654534_1024_768.jpg
Charlize Theron isn’t getting penetrated but seems to be mentally suggesting as much for rival Dior:
http://ecibas.free.fr/ecibas/images/charlize_Theron_Jadore_Dior.jpg
Dolce & Gabana’s ad has no actual nudity yet seems more rough than Pat’s imagined perfume ad:
http://katiesmedia.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/03cq6dg1.jpg
Puma’s hypothetical ad (done by a firm on spec that never got approved and actually caused a lot of confusion and controversy when it went viral) is the next logical step:
http://www.adsneeze.com/media/2007/02/puma-ads-2.jpg
And finally, lest we get too high-brow or lose our sense of humor, we can always count on Burger King to class things up in this genre:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_O4kHh_scC-E/StQMdaOHu8I/AAAAAAAAABE/iwBFO7CB81k/s400/bk_blow_job_ad(2).jpg